Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 5/5/1998
Walker v. State
Citations
- 709 A.2d 177
- 121 Md. App. 364
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the prosecutor exceeded the bounds of proper comment by characterizing the defendant as an “animal” and “pervert”
- “The privilege of the public to attend trials is not [ ] unrestricted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Submitted Before Murphy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-11-28· cited 63×
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-06-13· cited 53×
- Tharp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-12-07· cited 41×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-24· cited 39×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-02-10· cited 19×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-10-08· cited 19×
- McCracken v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2003-03-31· cited 16×
- Tharp v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-06· cited 14×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-04-05· cited 13×
- Longus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 12×
- Belton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2023-05-31· cited 9×
- Lawson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-10· cited 7×
- Longus v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-26· cited 7×
- Holt v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1999-12-02· cited 7×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-11-02· cited 6×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 4×
- Juliano v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-01-27· cited 3×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 4,161×
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 2,040×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Coy v. IowaSupreme Court· 1988-06-29· cited 1,295×
- Viereck v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 360×
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 337×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- Watters v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-10-02· cited 51×
- Contee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1960-12-09· cited 49×
- Contee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-10-17· cited 23×
- Keene Corp. v. HallCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-07-01· cited 17×
- White v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-01-14· cited 16×
- Cox v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-02-14· cited 14×
- Craig v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-04-08· cited 13×
- Commonwealth v. FeilingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1969-03-20· cited 11×
- Stebbins v. MacySupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.