Court of Appeals of Maryland· 12/7/2000
Tharp v. State
Citations
- 763 A.2d 151
- 362 Md. 77
- 2000 Md. LEXIS 762
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the petitioner's trial attorney had the right, as a member of the public, to challenge a courtroom closure on the public's behalf
- holding that the petitioner’s trial attorney had the right, as a member of the public, to challenge a courtroom closure on the public’s behalf
- tracing the right of criminal defendants to a public trial in Maryland to its common law roots, and noting that the right to “[t]he openness of criminal trials also finds penumbral support in Article 21 of the [Maryland] Declaration of Rights”
- tracing the right of criminal defendants to a public trial in Maryland to its common law roots, and noting that the right to \[t]he openness of criminal trials also finds penumbral support in Article 21 of the [Maryland] Declaration of Rights\
- witnesses sequestered pursuant to the rale “are no longer considered members of the general public for purposes of exclusion from the courtroom during criminal proceedings”
- witnesses sequestered under the rule “are no longer considered members of the general public for purposes of exclusion from the courtroom during criminal proceedings, and a criminal defendant’s right to a public trial is in no way damaged by proper sequestration . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harrell, Rodowsky
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JordanTennessee Supreme Court· 2010-09-22· cited 318×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-28· cited 82×
- Nicely v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-29· cited 39×
- General v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-01-14· cited 36×
- Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-14· cited 31×
- State v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-29· cited 31×
- Rollins v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-01-28· cited 27×
- Cole v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-11-12· cited 27×
- Mason v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-16· cited 15×
- Longus v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-10-26· cited 12×
- Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-04-02· cited 10×
- Howard v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-03-28· cited 9×
- Lindsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2018-01-02· cited 9×
- Poole v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-09-26· cited 9×
- In Re Ashley E.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-07-20· cited 8×
- Admin. Off. of the Courts v. Abell Fnd.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-07-28· cited 8×
- State of Arizona v. Brian K. HancockCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-07-29· cited 7×
- Nero v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-05-07· cited 6×
- Venter v. Board of EducationCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-01· cited 5×
- Jarrett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-12-17· cited 4×
Cites
55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 2,166×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1980-07-02· cited 1,951×
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,807×
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-11-17· cited 1,679×
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court· 1982-06-23· cited 1,561×
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court· 1979-07-02· cited 1,226×
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,120×
- Craig v. HarneySupreme Court· 1947-10-15· cited 697×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
- Levine v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-05-23· cited 408×
- Vivona v. ConboySupreme Court· 1959-10-12· cited 351×
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-27· cited 259×
- Lynx, Inc. v. Ordnance Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-11-06· cited 171×
- Grandison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-04-01· cited 149×
- United States v. Clark N. FischelFifth Circuit· 1982-09-10· cited 105×
- State v. BurriWashington Supreme Court· 1976-05-27· cited 101×
- Bloodsworth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-29· cited 96×
- In Re Petition for Writ of ProhibitionCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-08· cited 74×
- Kardy v. SHOOK, J.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-15· cited 67×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.