Wagatsuma v. Patch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, for purposes of judicial review, “[s]ummary judgment is analogous to a directed verdict”
• noting that, for purposes of judicial review, “[s]ummary judgment is analogous to a directed verdict”
• holding in products liability case that “[s]ince it is obvious to all that swimming pools are dangerous to young children, we take judicial notice of that fact.”
• explaining the standards of proof for the jury to find breach of duty and causation in a products liability case
• “ ‘[T]he issue of breach of duty is common to both negligence and strict products liability claims and is ordinarily one for the jury.’ ”
• “[t]he issue of breach of duty is common to both negligence and strict products liability claims and is ordinarily one for the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).