Josue v. Isuzu Motors America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that the dangers of riding unrestrained in an open cargo bed of a pickup truck are obvious and generally known to the ordinary user”
• holding “that the dangers of riding unrestrained in an open cargo bed of a pickup truck are obvious and generally known to the ordinary user”
• reiterating, in products liability context, that “faced with a plain and palpable danger for purposes of a failure to warn claim, a court may determine such danger to be open and obvious as a matter of law”
• a denial of \a request for continuance pursuant to HRCP Rule 56(f) will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion\
• a denial of \a request for continuance pursuant to HRCP Rule 56(f) will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion\
• \A [circuit] court's decision to deny a request for continuance pursuant to HRCP Rule 56(f) will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.\ (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).