Rodriguez v. GEN. DYNAMICS ARMAMENT & TECH. PRODS.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that expert testimony as to cause of detonation was admissible and lack of testing was not a valid basis to exclude testimony where expert reasonably based his determination on scientific method and experience in the field
• “Plaintiffs’ negligence and strict liability claims do not require the court to delve into the reasonableness of military procedures. Plaintiffs’ claims seek damages and are therefore easy for the court to resolve based on judicially manageable standards.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).