Vulcan Golf, LLC v. Google Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]s noted by the significant weight of authority detailed above, the differences in the unjust enrichment laws are sufficiently substantive to preclude class certification.”
• “The existence of affirmative defenses [such as fair use of trademarks] which require individual resolution can be considered as part of the court’s analysis to determine whether individual issues predominate under Rule 23(b)(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yarger v. Ing Bank, FSB
  D. Delaware· 2012-08-27· cited 21×
• In re Aqua Dots Products Liability Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-10-04· cited 17×
• Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google Inc.
  Second Circuit· 2013-07-01· cited 13×
• Shurland v. Bacci Café & Pizzeria on Ogden, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-11-02· cited 12×
• In re McDonald's French Fries Litigation
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-05-06· cited 7×
• Harris v. Comscore, Inc.
  N.D. Illinois· 2013-04-02· cited 6×
• Tyler v. Alltel Corp.
  E.D. Arkansas· 2010-02-23· cited 3×
• FPX, LLC v. Google, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2011-09-29· cited 2×
• Cox v. Sherman Capital LLC
  S.D. Indiana· 2013-08-08

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon
  Supreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
• Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin
  Supreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
• Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
• John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 519×
• Pedro De La Fuente v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., Marcelino Vasquez and Albert Solis, Defendants
  Seventh Circuit· 1983-09-19· cited 404×
• Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of Chicago
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-10-12· cited 393×
• Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. Mowbray
  First Circuit· 2000-03-31· cited 347×
• Rosario v. Livaditis
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-05-13· cited 340×
• Gunnells v. Healthplan Services, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2003-10-30· cited 231×
• McLaughlin v. American Tobacco Co.
  Second Circuit· 2008-04-03· cited 224×
• In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-05-02· cited 194×
• Nancy R. Murray, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Gmac Mortgage Corporation, Doing Business as ditech.com, Defendant-Respondent
  Seventh Circuit· 2006-01-17· cited 175×
• Gene and Gene LLC v. BIOPAY LLC
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 134×
• Sidney Davis, III v. Charles T. Hutchins
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-02-26· cited 122×
• Door Systems, Incorporated v. Pro-Line Door Systems, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-05-06· cited 115×
• Luther Haynes and Lenita Haynes v. Logan Furniture Mart, Inc., an Illinois Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1974-10-31· cited 103×
• Theresa L. Cannon Williams, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated, and Lois Reed v. Chartwell Financial Services, Ltd.
  Seventh Circuit· 2000-02-08· cited 90×
• Mil-Mar Shoe Company, Incorporated v. Shonac Corporation
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-02· cited 84×
• Thorogood v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-10-28· cited 82×
• Clay v. American Tobacco Co.
  S.D. Illinois· 1999-07-09· cited 77×