Door Systems, Incorporated v. Pro-Line Door Systems, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming summary judgment for defendant where there was “no reasonable likelihood that any significant number of consumers could mistake the defendant for the plaintiff’
• affirming summary judgment when there was no genuine issue of material fact as to likelihood of confusion
• affirming summary judgment for the defendant when there was \no reasonable likelihood that any significant number of consumers could mistake the defendant for the plaintiff\
• affirming summary judgment for defendant where there was \no reasonable likelihood that any significant number of consumers could mistake the defendant for the plaintiff\
• affirming summary judgment when there was no genuine issue of material fact as to likelihood of confusion
• evidence that two consumers were misled by defendant’s mark did not create “contestable issue” of likelihood of confusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).