V.P. Clarence Co. v. Colgate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that arguments made by counsel, and statements contained in a brief, are not evidence
• stating that “the [Legislature is presumed to act with knowledge of relevant case law”
• stating that arguments made by counsel, and statements contained in a brief, are not evidence
• stating that “the [L]egislature is presumed to act with knowledge of relevant case law”
• stating that “the [Legislature is presumed to act with knowledge of relevant case law”
• interpreting statute in light of presumption that the legislature knows of existing law when it passes statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).