Skip to main content
· 3/11/1999

State v. Cleve

Citations

  • 980 P.2d 23
  • 127 N.M. 240
  • 1999 NMSC 017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that when “offenses are defined by statutes providing several alternatives,” courts “focus on the legal theory of the case and disregard any inapplicable statutory elements” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • noting that when “offenses are defined by statutes 9 providing several alternatives,” courts “focus on the legal theory of the case and 10 disregard any inapplicable statutory elements” (internal quotation marks and citation 11 omitted)
  • commenting that the general/specific “rule in effect treats the special law as an exception to the general law because . . . the Legislature’s attention is more particularly directed to the relevant subject matter in deliberating upon the special law”
  • commenting that the general/specific “rule in effect treats the special law as an exception to the general law because . . . the Legislature’s attention is more particularly directed to the relevant subject matter in deliberating upon the special law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Serna, Minzner, Baca, Franchini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.