Skip to main content
· 5/31/1904

Matter of Christensen Engineering Co.

Citations

  • 194 U.S. 458
  • 24 S. Ct. 729
  • 48 L. Ed. 1072
  • 1904 U.S. LEXIS 786

Syllabus

<p>When an order imposing a fine for violation of an injunction is substantially one to reimburse the party injured by the disobedience, although called one in a contempt proceeding, it is to be regarded as merely an interlocutory, order, and to be reviewed only on appeal from the final decree.</p> <p>Where, however, the fine is payable to the United States, and is clearly punitive and in vindication of the authority of .the court, it dominates , the proceeding and is reviewable by the Circuit Court of Appeals on writ of error, Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 324, and the court should take jurisdiction and in case of its refusal mandamus will-issue from this court directing it so to do.'</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining adjudications of criminal contempt appealable prior to final judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.