Skip to main content

Vogelhut v. Kandel

Citations

  • 517 A.2d 1092
  • 308 Md. 183
  • 1986 Md. LEXIS 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since [the first attorney] had been employed under a contingent fee arrangement, after he was discharged by [the client], his claim against her was limited to any fee due him for the reasonable value of the services he had rendered to her”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Eldridge, Cole, Rodowsky, Couch, McAuliffe, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Vogelhut v. Kandel

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.