Skip to main content
· 2/19/1999

Engel & Engel, P.A. v. Ingerman

Citations

  • 724 A.2d 645
  • 353 Md. 43
  • 1999 Md. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing attorneys’ fees in workers’ compensation cases and stating that when “ ‘the language of the statute is plain and clear and expresses a meaning consistent with the statute’s apparent purpose, no further analysis is ordinarily required.’ ”
  • the agency is “uniquely positioned to conduct the delicate balance of protecting claimants and assuring adequate compensation.”
  • the agency is “uniquely positioned to conduct the delicate balance of protecting claimants and assuring adequate compensation.”
  • the agency is “uniquely positioned to conduct the delicate balance of protecting claimants and assuring adequate compensation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Rodowsky, Chasanow, Raker, Wilner, Cathell, Thieme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.