Fifth Circuit· 1/14/2002
Vogel v. Veneman
Citations
- 276 F.3d 729
- 2002 WL 2914
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming district court’s grant of summary judgment for lien holder on homeowner’s action for declaratory judgment that the lien was invalid, because lien was in fact valid
- “Except in cases of extraordinary circumstances, we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.”
- “Except in cases of ‘extraordinary circumstances,’ we do not consider issues raised for the first time on appeal.” (quoting N. Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. City of San Juan, 90 F.3d 910, 916 (5th Cir. 1996)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garza, Parker, Dennis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Fifth Circuit· 2002-12-09· cited 1,161×
- Jackson v. Cal-Western Packaging Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2010-03-26· cited 383×
- Pluet v. FrasierFifth Circuit· 2004-01-09· cited 86×
- Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. v. Cal Western Reconveyance Corp.Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-02-25· cited 85×
- Charlene H. Salge v. Edna Independent School DistrictFifth Circuit· 2005-05-27· cited 82×
- Noris Rogers v. Pearland Indep School DistrictFifth Circuit· 2016-06-28· cited 57×
- Boston Old Colony Insurance v. Tiner Associates Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2002-04-09· cited 41×
- Chapman v. Bituminous Insurance (In Re Coho Resources, Inc.)Fifth Circuit· 2003-09-08· cited 41×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-04-09· cited 41×
- Thompson v. Florida Wood Treaters, Inc.Virgin Islands· 2009-12-06· cited 36×
- Southern Insurance Company v. Affiliated FM InsuraFifth Circuit· 2016-07-21· cited 21×
- Brown v. Protective Life InsuranceFifth Circuit· 2003-12-30· cited 16×
- Ondimar Transportes Maritimos v. Beatty Street Properties, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2009-01-13· cited 12×
- Roth v. MimsN.D. Texas· 2003-03-14· cited 10×
- Ferrell v. CountrymanE.D. Texas· 2009-01-06· cited 9×
- In Re PrevoS.D. Texas· 2008-08-06· cited 5×
- Sylvia Zepeda v. Federal Home Loan Mtge Corp.Fifth Circuit· 2019-08-15· cited 5×
- In re MoralesW.D. Texas· 2014-10-21· cited 3×
- Diamond Offshore Co. v. A&B Builders, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2002-08-30· cited 1×
- Salge v. Edna Indep Sch DistFifth Circuit· 2005-06-13
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sharon Olabisiomotosho v. City of Houston City of Houston P. J. Bartlett K. L. Richards Rene BertrandFifth Circuit· 1999-09-29· cited 435×
- Benchmark Bank v. CrowderTexas Supreme Court· 1996-05-10· cited 284×
- North Alamo Water Supply Corporation v. City of San Juan, TexasFifth Circuit· 1996-04-15· cited 175×
- United States v. Floyd Julius Patrin, Sr., United States of America v. Barbara PatrinNinth Circuit· 1978-04-20· cited 127×
- Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court· 1890-04-13· cited 97×
- Durst v. SwiftTexas Supreme Court· 1854-07-01· cited 60×
- Butler Aviation International, Inc. v. Whyte (In Re Fairchild Aircraft Corp.)Fifth Circuit· 1993-11-17· cited 51×
- In the Matter of Bobby R. Rubarts and Naomi Rubarts, Debtors. Bobby R. Rubarts and Naomi Rubarts v. First Gibraltar Bank, FsbFirst Circuit· 1990-03-12· cited 26×
- McGahey v. FordCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-03-09· cited 23×
- Means v. United Fidelity Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-03-23· cited 20×
- Firstbank v. PopeE.D. Texas· 1992-06-05· cited 8×
- Hughes v. Team Bank (In Re Hughes)N.D. Texas· 1993-03-22· cited 6×
- Moore v. Bank of Commerce (In Re Moore)N.D. Texas· 1990-02-06· cited 4×
- Vogel v. GlickmanW.D. Texas· 2000-08-14· cited 4×
- Julian v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (In Re Julian)N.D. Texas· 1994-02-11· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.