Benchmark Bank v. Crowder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that late-filed evidence may not be considered unless the record affirmatively shows the trial court’s acceptance of the late filing
• holding that an appellate court may not consider evidence that was not before the trial court
• holding that late-filed evidence may not be considered unless the record affirmatively shows the trial court's acceptance of the late filing
• concluding that “summary judgment evidence may be filed late, but only with leave of court”
• holding that late-filed evidence may not be considered unless the record affirmatively shows the trial court's acceptance of the late filing
• holding that where nothing in the record indicates leave of court for late filing of a summary judgment response, appellate court should presume the trial court did not consider the late-filed evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).