Vogel v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “‘mere presence’” of an oath has “‘never been regarded as sufficient to remove a statement from the hearsay category.’” (quoted source omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Vogel v. Donald Percy
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-10-29· cited 27×
• Schroeder v. State
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1979-05-31

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chambers v. Mississippi
  Supreme Court· 1973-02-21· cited 5,756×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• Pinkerton v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-10-14· cited 3,200×
• Snyder v. Massachusetts
  Supreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
• Dutton v. Evans
  Supreme Court· 1970-12-15· cited 1,926×
• Bridges v. Wixon
  Supreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 672×
• Di Carlo v. United States
  Second Circuit· 1925-03-09· cited 246×
• United States v. Theodore D. Morlang
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-12-30· cited 172×
• State v. Lenarchick
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1976-11-30· cited 122×
• United States v. Larry Everett Shoupe and Craig Whitman Williams
  Sixth Circuit· 1977-01-28· cited 62×
• United States v. Clifford E. Payne, United States of America v. Roland Payne, United States of America v. Hubert Payne
  Fourth Circuit· 1974-02-08· cited 50×
• Haldane v. State
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-10-03· cited 17×