State v. Lenarchick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that questioning broader than whether the state had made specific promises should have been allowed, including questions about whether the witness hoped or expected the state to reward him
• A circuit court may control the reading of a transcript at closing argument so it is not unduly time consuming and so that the portions selected do not give an undue emphasis.
• dealing with a refusal to give defendant's requested instruction
• denial of recollection may be inconsistent with prior statement
• witness “denies recollection of a prior statement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).