Court of Claims· 1/16/1987
Voge v. United States
Citations
- 11 Cl. Ct. 510
- 1987 U.S. Claims LEXIS 6
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Therefore, it is concluded that the court can review OFR’s in an action challenging the termination of ASP, which derives from a money-mandating statute.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nettesheim
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Voge v. United States
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.