Campione v. Adamar of New Jersey, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that gaming commission regulations sanctioning the use of card counting countermeasures were intended \to minimize the perceived threat of card counters to the statistical advantage that casinos need to remain profitable\
• acknowledging that gaming commission regulations sanctioning the use of card counting countermeasures were intended \to minimize the perceived threat of card counters to the statistical advantage that casinos need to remain profitable\
• acknowledging that gaming commission regulations sanctioning the use of card counting countermeasures were intended “to minimize the perceived threat of card counters to the statistical advantage that casinos need to remain profitable”
• declining to imply cause of action for money damages for plaintiff because Casino Control Act contains elaborate regulatory scheme and no such cause of action existed at common law
• allowing a private right of action regarding casino-related statutes and regulations \could dislocate the intricate regulatory structure governing a sensitive industry\ and \introduce confusion where uniformity is needed\
• discussing CCC’s countermeasures to card counting, which threatens a casino’s statistical advantage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).