Skip to main content
D. New Jersey· 9/20/1984

Vitiello v. Cicconi

Citations

  • 103 F.R.D. 130
  • 40 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 54
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • certifying the plaintiff’s proposed class and subclass, “but with the class and subclass periods’ termination dates different from those requested by the plaintiffs”
  • “Reliance is an issue lurking behind every securities fraud claim, and to require that it first be proven, would effectively negate the concept of a 10b-5 class action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.