· 2/1/1967
Arthur Barnes v. Meyer Osofsky, Alfred N. Greenberg v. Aileen, Inc., Reginald Smith v. Aileen, Inc.
Citations
- 373 F.2d 269
- 1 A.L.R. Fed. 1011
- 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7577
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- interpreting the same “such security” language under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
- recognizing “extension of liability to open-market purchasers”
- buyer of securities not sold on registration statement not allowed 1933 Act § 11 remedies
- buyer of securities not sold on registration statement not allowed 1933 Act § 11 remedies
- “the time may have come for Congress to 8 reexamine these two remarkable pioneering statutes in the light of thirty years’ experience”
- “[A]n action under § 11 may be maintained only by one who comes within a narrow class of persons, i.e., those who purchase securities that are the direct subject of the prospectus and registration statement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lumbard, Friendly, Hays
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.