Skip to main content
· 2/1/1967

Arthur Barnes v. Meyer Osofsky, Alfred N. Greenberg v. Aileen, Inc., Reginald Smith v. Aileen, Inc.

Citations

  • 373 F.2d 269
  • 1 A.L.R. Fed. 1011
  • 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 7577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting the same “such security” language under § 11 of the Securities Act of 1933
  • recognizing “extension of liability to open-market purchasers”
  • buyer of securities not sold on registration statement not allowed 1933 Act § 11 remedies
  • buyer of securities not sold on registration statement not allowed 1933 Act § 11 remedies
  • “the time may have come for Congress to 8 reexamine these two remarkable pioneering statutes in the light of thirty years’ experience”
  • “[A]n action under § 11 may be maintained only by one who comes within a narrow class of persons, i.e., those who purchase securities that are the direct subject of the prospectus and registration statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Friendly, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.