Skip to main content
· 3/31/1994

In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation

Citations

  • 848 F. Supp. 527
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4463
  • 1994 WL 120166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that 'dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical'
  • acknowledging that \dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical\
  • acknowledging that 'dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical'
  • acknowledging that \dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical\
  • rejecting aiding and abetting liability and stating, “[H]ad Congress intended to expand the scope of liability under private rights of action to include aiders and abettors, Congress would have done so explicitly.”
  • Delaware case law does not \extend[ ] liability for negligent misrepresentation to the general investing public\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farnan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.