· 3/31/1994
In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation
Citations
- 848 F. Supp. 527
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4463
- 1994 WL 120166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that 'dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical'
- acknowledging that \dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical\
- acknowledging that 'dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical'
- acknowledging that \dispositive defenses that are unique to the named Plaintiffs may render their claims atypical\
- rejecting aiding and abetting liability and stating, “[H]ad Congress intended to expand the scope of liability under private rights of action to include aiders and abettors, Congress would have done so explicitly.”
- Delaware case law does not \extend[ ] liability for negligent misrepresentation to the general investing public\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farnan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.