Vigo v. Vigo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the parties’ condominium was purchased during the marriage with the Husband’s nonmarital funds and it was titled solely in the Husband’s name, thus “at trial, the Wife was required to establish that the Husband intended to gift to her a one-half interest in the condominium”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fortune v. Fortune
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-04-27· cited 18×
• Bishop v. Bishop
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-29· cited 15×
• & SC16-589 Nancy Hooker v. Timothy I. Hooker and Timothy I. Hooker v. Nancy Hooker
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-03-30· cited 8×
• Timothy I. Hooker v. Nancy Hooker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-08-26· cited 2×
• ANDRES SUAREZ v. ELSA SUAREZ
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Zeigler v. Zeigler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-14· cited 41×
• Rosecan v. Springer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-16· cited 26×
• Green v. Green
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-13· cited 14×
• Glazner v. Glazner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-05-02· cited 10×
• Miulli v. Miulli
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-27· cited 7×
• Mills v. Mills
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-04-09· cited 6×