Glazner v. Glazner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]o ensure equitable distribution of assets, lump sum alimony is properly awarded only when the evidence reflects a justification for such an award and the ability of the paying spouse to make the payment “without substantially endangering his or her economic status.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Guida v. Guida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-24· cited 23×
• Mondello v. Torres
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17· cited 23×
• Porzio v. Porzio
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-23· cited 12×
• Rosario v. Rosario
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-27· cited 9×
• Greene v. Greene
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-11· cited 7×
• Vigo v. Vigo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-06-17· cited 5×
• Gregory Rawson, Former Husband v. Lisa L. Rawson, Former Wife
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-02-04· cited 5×
• Weller v. Weller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-05-01
• Garcia-Ribeyro v. Garcia-Ribeyro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-19

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• Campbell v. Campbell
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-02· cited 36×
• Gorman v. Gorman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-03· cited 32×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-07-26· cited 31×
• Iribar v. Iribar
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-07-21· cited 29×
• Lynch v. Lynch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-15· cited 19×
• Brock v. Brock
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-08· cited 11×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1981-06-04· cited 10×