Southern Pacific Communications Co. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the “statistical one-sidedness of the trial court’s evidentiary, factual and legal rulings simply cannot be used to support an inference of judicial bias”
• “statistical one-sidedness of the trial court’s evidentiary, factual and legal rulings simply cannot be used to support an inference of judicial bias”
• “[T]he statistical one-sidedness of the trial court’s evidentiary, factual and legal rulings simply cannot be used to support an inference of judicial bias.”
• “We conclude that the statistical one-sidedness of the trial court’s evidentiary, factual and legal rulings simply cannot be used to support an inference of judicial bias.”
• “We conclude that the statistical one-sidedness of the trial court’s evidentiary, factual and legal rulings simply cannot be used to support an inference of judicial bias.”
• \[W]e agree with the standard articulated by the Seventh Circuit . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).