District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 8/10/2006
Vest v. United States
Citations
- 905 A.2d 263
- 2006 D.C. App. LEXIS 482
- 2006 WL 2283895
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that circumstantial evidence is sufficient to prove the existence of a measurable amount of a controlled substance
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruiz, Reid, King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named Vest v. United States
7 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-11-28· cited 2×
- Vest v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-11-06· cited 1×
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-10-03
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-11-28
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-02-23
- Vest v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-11-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.