Skip to main content

Phillips v. State

Citations

  • 271 P.3d 457
  • 2012 Alas. App. LEXIS 25
  • 2012 WL 524184

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining appearance of bias is assessed according to whether “given the circumstances, reasonable people would question the judge’s ability to be fair”
  • \We review denial of a motion to disqualify a judge for abuse of discretion.\
  • “[T]he ‘abuse of discretion’ standard of review applies only to a judge’s decision on the issue of whether the judge is actually capable of being fair.” (emphasis omitted)
  • “On the separate issue of whether, given the circumstances, reasonable people would question the judge’s ability to be fair, the proper standard of review is de novo — because ‘reasonable appearance of bias’ is assessed under an objective standard.”
  • discussing distinction between bias and appearance of bias

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coats, Mannheimer, Bolger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.