C.D. California· 12/22/2008
Velazquez v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.
Citations
- 605 F. Supp. 2d 1049
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108215
- 2008 WL 5753556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the resolution of contractual claims on a motion to dismiss may be proper if the terms of the contract are unambiguous’
- taking judicial notice of two deeds of trust and a full reconveyance recorded in the Official Records of the Los Angeles County, California, Recorder
- taking judicial notice of two deeds of trust and a full re-conveyance recorded in the Official Records of the Los Angeles County, California, Recorder
- taking judicial notice of two deeds of trust and a full reconveyance recorded in the Official Records of the Los Angeles County, California, Recorder
- taking judicial notice of disclosure statements along with properly incorporated mortgage note where the authenticity and relevance of disclosure statements were not contested
- taking judicial notice of two deeds of trust and a full re-conveyance recorded in the Official Records of the Los Angeles County, California, Recorder
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean D. Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rubio v. Capital One BankNinth Circuit· 2010-07-21· cited 150×
- Boschma v. Home Loan Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2011-08-10· cited 92×
- Consumer Solutions Reo, LLC v. HilleryN.D. California· 2009-08-26· cited 52×
- Deutsche Bank National Trust v. GilbertAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-25· cited 32×
- Hall v. Live Nation Worldwide, Inc.C.D. California· 2015-11-12· cited 31×
- Griffin v. Green Tree Servicing, LLCC.D. California· 2015-04-09· cited 20×
- Rose v. Seamless Financial Corp.S.D. California· 2013-01-02· cited 1×
- Stocco v. Gemological Institute of America, Inc.S.D. California· 2013-09-24
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentNinth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 5,771×
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesNinth Circuit· 2001-05-04· cited 2,878×
- Herman Resnick v. Warden Hayes Lt. Ernst Officer Myers (Dho) Counselor Aune Officer WadeNinth Circuit· 2000-05-22· cited 1,510×
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 1,311×
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaNinth Circuit· 1994-01-12· cited 1,208×
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-07-30· cited 1,052×
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 896×
- Parrino v. FHP, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-12· cited 530×
- Southern Cross Overseas Agencies, Inc. v. Wah Kwong Shipping Group Ltd.Third Circuit· 1999-06-25· cited 472×
- Mgic Indemnity Corporation v. Lawrence I. Weisman, Thomas P. Dunn, L.N. Nevels, Jr., and Henry K.F. KerstingNinth Circuit· 1986-12-05· cited 441×
- Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney TurnerNinth Circuit· 1980-02-29· cited 430×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1996-07-17· cited 412×
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2002-03-04· cited 393×
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 363×
- Galbraith v. County of Santa ClaraNinth Circuit· 2002-10-09· cited 352×
- Bay Cities Paving & Grading, Inc. v. Lawyers' Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 331×
- King v. CaliforniaNinth Circuit· 1986-03-07· cited 161×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.