Skip to main content
· 9/27/1996

Vazquez Gonzalez v. K-Mart Corp.

Citations

  • 940 F. Supp. 429
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1097
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15408
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,549
  • 1996 WL 596288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Stating that plaintiff bears the ultimate burden of proof to rebut evidence proffered by defendant to the effect that plaintiff had abandoned her job
  • “Isolated ambiguous statements are not sufficiently probative of discriminatory animus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Laffitte

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.