Skip to main content

Vaughn v. Drennon

Citations

  • 202 S.W.3d 308
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 6189
  • 2006 WL 2005495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the core of the tort is the offense of prying into the private domain of another
  • holding that evidence showing that defendant had watched plaintiffs while they were outside and had used binoculars to look at them through “a large window with the blinds open” did not support a finding that the defendant had intruded on the plaintiffs’ seclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worthen, Griffith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.