Computek Computer & Office Supplies, Inc. v. Walton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that injunctive provision that prohibited deleting of all records and files was too broad
• holding permanent injunction violated Rule 683 because order failed to specifically identify clients restrained party could not contact and also prohibited'activities restrained party had legal right to perform
• trial court weighs the respective conveniences and hardships of the parties and balances the equities in determining whether to grant equitable remedy of injunction
• “[T]he injunction itself must provide the specific information . . . without inferences or conclusion, or, in this case, implied references to other records [the enjoined party] might have.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).