Brewerton v. Dalrymple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that wife‘s loss of consortium claim failed because it was wholly derivative of her husband‘s IIED claim, which the court held failed as a matter of law
• holding that wife’s loss of consortium claim failed because it was wholly derivative of her husband’s IIED claim, which the court held failed as a matter of law
• holding that although a defendant made negative and allegedly retaliatory comments that were reflected in a professor’s tenure file and repeatedly recommended that the professor should not be allowed to continue on a tenure track, this conduct was not extreme and outrageous
• holding that although a defendant made negative and allegedly retaliatory comments that were reflected in a professor‘s tenure file and repeatedly recommended that the professor should not be allowed to continue on a tenure track, this conduct was not extreme and outrageous
• explaining that a wife’s loss of consortium claim was “wholly derivative of her husband’s intentional infliction claim” and because the IIED claim failed, the derivative loss of consortium claim also failed
• terminating employee, even with added issue of negative comments, restricting free speech rights, and assigning excessive workload did not meet the standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).