Vaughan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein the court held that questioning witness about whether he drank and played cards with accused was “proper on cross-examination as tending to show the relation existing between the parties ... as having some bearing before the jury on the question of bias”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Evans v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-25· cited 201×
• Broyles v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1954-02-19· cited 35×
• Rogers v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-09-28· cited 29×
• Dorsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-07-15· cited 18×
• Hudson v. Stripling
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1954-06-24· cited 18×
• Pope v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1957-01-22· cited 11×
• Anderson v. State
  Alabama Court of Appeals· 1968-04-23· cited 9×
• Dorsey and Wilson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1975-11-28· cited 9×
• Woolf v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2014-05-02· cited 9×
• State v. Hawkins
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1919-10-24· cited 6×
• Riggs v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2013-05-03· cited 2×
• Ware v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-02-02· cited 1×
• People v. Peetz
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1959-03-02

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Commonwealth v. Paese
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1908-03-02· cited 41×