State v. Hawkins
Citations
- 25 N.M. 514
- 184 P. 977
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT</p> <p>1. Alleged improper remarks of counsel in his argument to the jury, not made a part of the record on appeal hy hill of exceptions, will not he considered. P. 515</p> <p>2. Where a witness has testified as to the general, reputation of the accused, it is competent to inquire of him, on cross-examination, as to whether he has heard reports of particular instances which are inconsistent with the reputation to which he has testified and the character which he has attributed to him. P. 516</p>
Judges: Parker, Raynolds, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-01-30· cited 61×
- State v. HunterNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-08-01· cited 28×
- State v. CostalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-01-09· cited 14×
- State v. SandovalNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1966-07-18· cited 12×
- Davis Carruth v. Valley Mercantile, Etc., Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1928-02-07· cited 12×
- State v. McKinzieNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1963-03-28· cited 3×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State of Kansas v. KillionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1915-05-08· cited 34×
- McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1914-04-29· cited 31×
- Vaughan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1918-03-23· cited 28×
- Stout v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1916-08-01· cited 20×
- Jung Quey v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1915-05-03· cited 19×
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1912-07-09· cited 16×
- State v. BallesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1918-04-03· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.