Vaughan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding there was no evidence the public was disturbed where “there was testimony that several witnesses heard the [defendant’s] speech, [but] there was no testimony that anyone filed a complaint concerning it”
• evidence insufficient to support a conviction for disorderly conduct where defendant became loud and verbally abusive which disturbed motel occupants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).