Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the issue of whether a company engaged in a pattern or practice of intentional discrimination in the planning an execution of a RIF was sufficient to meet the burden of establishing predominance
• noting that supervisors had allegedly “voiced a desire to . . . lay off the senior-most engineers at the plant”
• noting that supervisors had allegedly “voiced a desire to . . . lay off the senior-most engineers at the plant”
• stating that liability phase will determine whether the employer engaged in a pattern-or-practice of discrimination against its employees in violation of the ADEA
• certifying a class consisting persons “employed by one of Defendants, at any time since June 23, 2000”
• “[S]tanding alone, the prospect of individual defenses should not defeat authorization of a collective action in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2000-05-01· cited 16×
• Rodolico v. Unisys Corp.
  N.D. New York· 1999-08-25· cited 11×