Longcrier v. HL-A CO., INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that reconsideration motions are to be used sparingly, and stating, “imagine how a district court’s workload would multiply if it was obliged to rule twice on the same arguments by the same party upon request”
• noting that reconsideration motions are to be used sparingly, and stating, “imagine how a district court's workload would multiply if it w[ere] obliged to rule twice on the same arguments by the same party upon request”
• noting that reconsideration motions are to be used sparingly, and stating, “imagine how a district court’s workload would multiply if it was obliged to rule twice on the same arguments by the same party upon request”
• noting that reconsideration motions are to be used sparingly, and stating, “imagine how a district court’s workload would multiply if it w[ere] obliged to rule twice on the same arguments by the same party upon request”
• applying the lenient notice-stage standard to a conditional certification motion when discovery had not occurred
• “With respect to each of these alleged violations, Plaintiffs' theory is that HL-A, by virtue of this conduct, has failed to pay them statutorily required overtime compensation of 1.5 times their regular hourly rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).