Varela v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claim of ineffective assistance of counsel affecting right to appeal could be heard directly and did not have to be brought in a collateral proceeding
• allowing a claim of ineffective assistance 4 1 of counsel that affected the defendant’s right to appeal to be heard on direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hunter
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-07-26· cited 92×
• State v. Hosteen
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1996-09-04· cited 29×
• Deerman v. Board of County Commissioners of the County of Dona Ana
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-09-17· cited 21×
• State v. Franco
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-06-14· cited 8×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Evitts v. Lucey
  Supreme Court· 1985-03-18· cited 3,068×
• Govich v. North American Systems, Inc.
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-06-26· cited 146×
• State v. Duran
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-12-11· cited 67×
• State v. Peppers
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-05-03· cited 63×
• State v. Stenz
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-01-04· cited 46×
• Lowe v. Bloom
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1990-06-28· cited 35×
• Peralta v. State
  New Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-04-09· cited 10×
• Village of Ruidoso v. Rush
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1982-03-23· cited 9×
• State v. Hrabak
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-08-30· cited 8×