New Mexico Court of Appeals· 5/3/1990

State v. Peppers

Citations

796 P.2d 614
110 N.M. 393

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that 6 habeas corpus relief under Rule 5-802 NMRA is not the exclusive means for seeking 7 post-conviction relief and noting that a defendant may instead pursue a motion to 8 modify a sentence
stating that action by the district court pursuant to a post-trial motion under Section 39-1-1 can render an appeal unnecessary, thus promoting efficiency
noting that the conclusive presumption in Duran was created because “the question of ineffectiveness of counsel could be litigated for years in habeas corpus proceedings, with the likely result that an untimely appeal ultimately would be permitted”
declining to extend the presumption of ineffective assistance of counsel to defendant’s appealing from a non-conditional plea
declining to extend the presumption of ineffective assistance of counsel to defendant’s appealing from a non-conditional plea
declining to extend the presumption of ineffectiveness of 19 counsel to include appeals from pleas of guilty or no contest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartz, Alarid, Apodaca

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.