State v. Stenz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial counsel is not ineffective for failure to make a motion that is 8 not supported by the record
• holding that trial counsel is not ineffective for failure to make a motion that is 19 not supported by the record
• not ineffective assistance in failing to challenge warrantless search that was justified by exigent circumstances
• where defendant fails to meet burden of proving incompetence, this Court need not reach issue of prejudicial effect, if any, of trial counsel’s failure to move for suppression

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).