Skip to main content
· 8/26/2011

VALADEZ-LOPEZ v. Chertoff

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 851
  • 2011 WL 3805890

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that notice of appeal did not intend to appeal grant of summary judgment in favor of one deputy public defender defendant where the notice specifically named the order granting summary judgment in favor of a different deputy public defender defendant
  • concluding a district court need not “piece together a theory of liability from a string of unrelated and incoherent assertions”
  • holding 5 that an amended complaint supersedes the original and renders the original of no 6 legal effect
  • holding 7 that an amended complaint supersedes the original and renders the original of no 8 legal effect
  • explaining that an “amended complaint supersedes the original, the latter being treated 1 Cir. 2015
  • noting 14 that an amended complaint “supersedes the original” and renders it “thereafter as non-existent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Thomas, Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.