Supreme Court· 6/20/2016

Utah v. Strieff

Citations

579 U.S. 232
195 L. Ed. 2d 400
2016 U.S. LEXIS 3926

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an independent arrest warrant served as an intervening event between an unlawful stop and search incident to arrest
holding that a valid arrest warrant “entirely unconnected with -the [illegal] stop” was a sufficient intervening circumstance
holding that the connection between an officer’s conduct and a subsequent search was “interrupted by [the] intervening circumstance” of the issuance of a valid warrant
holding that evidence seized following an unlawful stop was admissible because the discovery of a valid warrant attenuated the illegal stop
concluding that a valid warrant constituted “a sufficient intervening event to break the causal chain” of an unconstitutional traffic stop.
holding that officer's discovery of valid, preexisting arrest warrant attenuated connection between unlawful investigatory stop and drug-related evidence seized from defendant during 3 search incident to arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

197 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.