S.D. New York· 3/28/2013
U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Syron
Citations
- 934 F. Supp. 2d 609
- 2013 WL 1285572
- 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48183
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disagreeing with Stoker and holding that defendant must personally receive money or property from the alleged fraud
- rejecting the SEC’s theories that defendants obtained money or property through misrepresentations that inflated their employer’s stock offerings because there was no allegation that defendants themselves benefitted because of the stock offerings
- signing investor documents that defendants knew to be misleading indicates substantial assistance
- rejecting argument that employee “obtains money or property” by engaging in fraudulent activity that is within the scope of his employment and for which he is compensated by his employer, without allegations that employee’s compensation was affected in some way by the fraud
- the SEC did not allege that defendants profited from the employer’s stock offering and the alleged fraud
- “Where factual allegations support multiple plausible inferences, the Court cannot decide among those interpretations on a motion to dismiss.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. WeyS.D. New York· 2017-03-27· cited 34×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. China Northeast Petroleum Holdings Ltd.S.D. New York· 2014-03-27· cited 29×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. GoldstoneD. New Mexico· 2013-07-08· cited 24×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. UstianN.D. Illinois· 2017-01-24· cited 13×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. DiMariaS.D. New York· 2016-09-15· cited 8×
- Federal Housing Finance Agency v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.S.D. New York· 2013-10-16· cited 5×
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. KameliN.D. Illinois· 2017-09-05· cited 4×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. SpinosaS.D. Florida· 2014-06-30· cited 3×
- U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. ITT Educ. Servs., Inc.S.D. Indiana· 2018-03-23· cited 3×
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court· 2007-06-21· cited 6,044×
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court· 1988-03-07· cited 3,007×
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1997-02-18· cited 2,720×
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Second Circuit· 2007-07-11· cited 2,369×
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1993-08-09· cited 1,468×
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-01-15· cited 943×
- Goldman v. BeldenSecond Circuit· 1985-02-12· cited 788×
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 769×
- Novak v. KasaksSecond Circuit· 2000-06-21· cited 686×
- United States v. PeoniSecond Circuit· 1938-12-12· cited 651×
- Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. SandbergSupreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 584×
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court· 1994-06-17· cited 584×
- Anderson News, L.L.C. v. American Media, Inc.Second Circuit· 2012-04-03· cited 386×
- In Re Morgan Stanley Information Fund SecuritiesSecond Circuit· 2010-01-25· cited 364×
- Kalnit v. EichlerSecond Circuit· 2001-09-05· cited 348×
- Paul Stevelman, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Alias Research Inc. And Stephen R.B. BinghamSecond Circuit· 1999-04-05· cited 330×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.