U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Levine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It cannot be disputed that a reasonable investor would want to know whether the person they are sending their money to in order to purchase a stock has been previously found to have violated the securities law.”
• “Nathan Strahl, M.D. and Ph.D., a board-certified psychiatrist, testified as an ME at the administrative hearing. [] The ME explained that Claimant’s medical issues are ‘in many ways 27 secondarily stemming’ from his ‘alcohol abuse.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).