Stephen King v. Allied Vision, Ltd. And Innovation Books, a Division of the Innovation Corporation, New Line Cinema Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the court was within its discretion to review and modify an attorney’s fees
• finding that “[a] contempt order is warranted only where the moving party established by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated the district court’s edict.”
• finding that “[a] contempt order is warranted only where the moving party established by clear and convincing evidence that the alleged contemnor violated the district court's edict.”
• requiring the movant to establish, among other things, that the alleged “contemnor has not diligently attempted to comply in a reasonable manner”
• rejecting defendant’s explanation for delayed compliance with decree based on lack of notice where order was published in law journal
• looking to the plain language of an order to determine whether party substantially complied with order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).