LFC Marketing Group, Inc. v. Loomis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “reverse piercing is appropriate in those limited instances where the particular facts and equities show the existence of an alter ego relationship and require that the corporate fiction be ignored so that justice may be promoted.”
• stating that to pierce the corporate veil, a plaintiff must establish by a preponderance of the evidence the elements of alter ego theory
• stating that to pierce the corporate veil, a plaintiff must establish by a preponderance of the evidence the elements of alter ego theory
• stating that to pierce the corporate veil, a plaintiff must establish by a preponderance of the evidence the elements of alter ego theory
• stating that to pierce the corporate veil, a plaintiff must establish by a preponderance of the evidence the elements of alter ego theory
• determining that the corporate entity in that case acted as the alter ego of an individual director

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).