Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 10/28/2008

United States v. Zedner

Citations

  • 555 F.3d 68
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 28018
  • 2008 WL 5586403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that “the presence of a jurisdictional issue forecloses consideration of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine”
  • observing that the issue of a mandate from the court of appeals “is not an issue of subject matter jurisdiction; it is purely a question as to the timing of the respective jurisdictions of [the court of appeals] and the district court”
  • “we have discretion to dismiss the appeal either with prejudice or without prejudice to reinstatement if the defendant returns to custody within a certain time”
  • “we have discretion to dismiss the appeal either with prejudice or without prejudice to reinstatement if the defendant returns to custody within a certain time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kearse, Pooler, Cote

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Zedner

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.