United States v. Zander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “Defendant adequately addressed the issue of plain error review in his reply to the government’s brief, after arguing in his opening brief that his objections below were sufficiently raised to be preserved for review on appeal”
• allowing the appellant to urge plain error in the reply brief after urging in the opening brief that the error had been preserved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).