United States v. Mark L. Shyres, United States of America v. Joseph E. Martino, United States of America v. Michael A. Orloff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a deprivation of “the right to control” property entails a deprivation of property
• holding that a business’s “customary procedure for paying invoices” can support a finding that the defendant used the mail to commit mail fraud
• implying that it was relevant whether the alleged victim “would have contracted the same services for less if it knew of the kickback scheme”
• upholding the district court’s decision denying disclosure of a witness’s PSR where the defendant presented no compelling or substantial need for it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).