United States v. Pelican
Citations
- 232 U.S. 442
- 34 S. Ct. 396
- 58 L. Ed. 676
- 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1374
Syllabus
<p>The'Colville Reservation in the State of Washington was set apart by Executive order in July, 1872, has been repeatedly recognized by acts of Congress and is a legally constituted reservation, and, as such, is included in Indian country to which § 2145, Rev. Stat., refers.</p> <p>A legally constituted Indian reservation is noné the less embraced within the Indian country referred to in § 2145, Rev. Stat., because it may have been segregated from the public domain.</p> <p>The authority of Congress to deal with crimes committed on or against Indians upon the lands within an Indian Reservation is not affected by the admission of the Territory, within which it is included, as a State into the Union.</p> <p>Lands allotted in severalty to the Indians on the Colville Reservation under the acts of July 1,1892, and July 1, 1898, when the rest of the reservation was thrown open to settlement were held in trust by the United States for the allottees under the jurisdiction and control of Congress for all governmental purposes relating to the guardianship and protection of the Indians.</p> <p>Congress has power to punish crimes committed by or against Indians upon allotted lands, and the allotments in severalty are embraced in the term .Indian country as used in § 2145, Rev. Stat., and the allotments of the Colville Reservation have not been excluded therefrom by the statutes providing for the allotments.</p> <p>Territorial jurisdiction of the United States does not.depend upon the size of the particular areas held for Federal purposes. Criminal Code, § 272.</p> <p>The retention by the United States of jurisdiction over Indian allotments is based on the fundamental consideration of the protection of a dependent people. United States v. Rickert, 188 U. S. 432.</p> <p>Part of the National policy in regard to Indians is that the United States shall retain control over the allotments in severalty for the statutory period during which the Indians are to be maintained as well as pr
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allotted lands remain “validly set apart for the use of the Indians” where they were excepted from restoration of portion of reservation to the A.O. public domain
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hughes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.