Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 12/18/2013

United States v. Winckelmann

Citations

73 M.J. 11
2013 WL 6687854
2013 CAAF LEXIS 1435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to reassess the sentence where the maximum amount of confinement decreased from 115 years to 51 years
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to reassess the sentence where the maximum amount of confinement decreased from 115 years to 51 years
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to reassess the sentence where the maximum amount of confinement decreased from 115 years to 51 years
holding CCAs may reassess a sentence if it “can determine to its satisfaction that, absent any error, the sentence adjudged would have been of at least a certain severity”
holding CCAs may reassess a sentence if it “can determine to its satisfaction that, absent any error, the sentence adjudged would have been of at least a certain severity” (citation omitted)
holding Courts of Criminal Appeals may reassess a sentence if it “can determine to its satisfaction that, absent any error, the sentence adjudged would have been of at least a certain severity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Erdmann, Ef-Fron, Stucky, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

150 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named United States v. Winckelmann

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.